Top perspectives

  • Siddharth GuptaBuilt Galileo’s Agent Reliability platform
    Six years as Software Engineer at AppleCo‑authored Nature Communications paper on occupancy

    The one-month honeymoon is real: a new workflow passes the happy-path demo, then quietly starts failing on edge cases nobody tested. At Galileo we saw this constantly. A 1% per-step error rate compounds into a 63% failure probability across a multi-step agent workflow, so the babysitting starts when the math catches up, not when the code changes.

  • Jerry Liu900K downloads a month
    Co-founder/CEO of LlamaIndexRaised $8.5M seed roundManaged ML ops at Robust Intelligence

    Most workflows break because the schema or extraction logic is underspecified at the start, so edge cases pile up and someone has to babysit the exceptions. I’d scope the process tighter, add confidence-based routing for human review, and benchmark on real documents rather than expecting 100% accuracy.

  • Pablo PalafoxAutomated tens of thousands of work hours monthly with AI agents
    Formerly Research Intern at PRO Unlimited$150M Series C at $1.2B valuation150+ enterprise customers including DHL, Uber

    The one-month drift is real: a prompt gets edited, a model updates, customers ask something new, and the workflow keeps running while quietly producing worse outcomes. At HappyRobot we built Northstars around it, pass-or-fail behavioral rules checked against real runs so one failing rule surfaces before the whole system rots.

  • Pavel VainshteinWarned that set‑and‑forget automations break after a month
    CEO of MentisAIBuilt Webflow‑to‑HubSpot sync runbookCreated Android app with YouTube API, Gson

    I keep hitting the same wall: the workflow isn't broken, the assumptions behind it are. When an n8n node silently changes its payload or a vector index drifts, the automation keeps running but starts lying. I now build every critical workflow with drift alerts, versioned routing, and an owner who gets woken up, not just a run log.

  • Bradley HuntRuns 80K+ autonomous AI actions monthly at Orica
    Manager - DevOps & Regional Apps at OricaRaised IT desk deflection to 94%Led APAC-first ServiceNow GenAI go-live

    The month mark is the tell: your workflow is probably a brittle hardcoded path that worked once, not a system that knows what to do when the world underneath it shifts.

  • Alyssa ClarcqCEO, Founder of Bricks Advisory
    Featured in Business InsiderInternal Audit Advisor at Cherry Hill Advisory

    I built myself into the same babysitting trap last year: I was automating too many routines at once and assuming they worked, then found a stale GitHub full of failed runs and slop I had ignored. The fix was not better prompts; it was carving out the human review point, the failure escalation, and the daily health check before the build went live.

  • Jinank ThakkerAI Solutions Specialist at Hyatt Hotels Corporation
    Founding engineer, Cin7-acquired OrderhiveSold repair business, 30,000+ repairs

    I built Jacobo on top of a Business OS I had already run for five years, because an AI agent without clean data and guardrails is just a chatbot that hallucinates and breaks. The month-one failure you are hitting is usually the data beneath it drifting, not the model; fix observability and the fallback tiers before you add another agent.

  • Vinod KhoslaFounder of Khosla Ventures
    Juniper Networks: 2,500x return#1 on 2026 Midas List

    That one-month decay is the cost of building AI interns without supervision loops. I’ve been saying for two years the right model is a few humans overseeing AI interns, not workflows left alone, and at Spawn they closed that loop by making agents watch production and heal around users.

  • Stephen MartinOwner/Founder of Martin Tech Labs
    Grew CashApp team 4 to 50Scaled Amazon NY fashion team from 2

    If your AI workflow needs babysitting after a month, it is not automated yet. At Cash App and Amazon I saw the same pattern: the maintenance bill kills more pilots than the model does, because nobody owned the misses, logged the bad runs, or made rollback obvious.