The Greatest Risk of Legal AI Isn't AI
In a LinkedIn post dated July 14, 2026, Thomas J. Powell argues that the primary danger of legal artificial intelligence is not the displacement of legal reasoning but the temptation for lawyers to rely on AI‑generated work that is fast and polished without proper verification. He explains that while AI can draft, organize, compare, and surface issues at extraordinary speed, it cannot assume professional responsibility. Lawyers must still question sources, test reasoning, and decide whether the output merits their name. Powell stresses that as AI capabilities grow, foundational legal skills—verification, judgment, and accountability—become even more critical. He calls for law schools to embed these skills throughout the curriculum rather than treating AI as a separate technology course. He highlights Ann McCrackin’s focus on the type of lawyers AI will produce, emphasizing the need to shape future practitioners who can responsibly harness AI tools.
Topics
Speed and Polish of Legal AI Tempting Lawyers to Bypass Verification
AI can produce legal drafts and analyses quickly and with a polished appearance, which may lead lawyers to accept the output without proper scrutiny.
Professional Responsibility Remains Irreplaceable by AI
Despite AI's capabilities, the lawyer must still verify sources, test reasoning, and decide if the work deserves their endorsement, as AI cannot assume ethical or professional duties.
Integrating Verification, Judgment, and Accountability into Law School Curricula
Law schools should weave AI‑related verification and accountability skills throughout legal education rather than isolating AI as a standalone technology course.
Ann McCrackin’s Question: What Kind of Lawyers Will AI Produce?
Highlighting Ann McCrackin’s focus on shaping the future lawyer’s skill set in the age of AI, emphasizing the need to define the professional identity AI will foster.